Finishing How They Started:

Evidence of Mean Reversion in the March Madness Tournament

Authors

  • Joey Smith Washington and Lee University
  • Joseph Wilck Bucknell University
  • Clint Buck Abilene Christian University

Keywords:

March Madness, Sports, Predictive Analytics

Abstract

Every year millions of people fill out NCAA men’s Division I basketball tournament brackets hoping to select as many winners as possible. While consistently choosing the better seed to win may be a safe strategy, many research efforts have tried to improve upon this approach. Some of these efforts use complex data and advanced statistical methods, making the process inaccessible to the common fan. Other research uses simpler but more understandable data and techniques. We build on this latter approach and introduce a new measurement system to assess underperformance or overperformance of a given team. This research provides a data-informed way to identify possible upsets. Our research identifies one very significant variable in predicting team performance in the tournament: the team’s preseason ranking. We also find that teams who win their conference tournament often underperform, perhaps due to recency bias and receiving an inflated seed.

References

Baumann, R., Matheson, V. A., & Howe, C. A. (2010). Anomalies in tournament design: The madness of March Madness. Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports, 6(2). https://crossworks.holycross.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1030&context=econ_working_papers

Bengal, C. (2023, March 13). 2023 March Madness: The odds of filling out a perfect bracket are 1 in 120.2 billion. https://www.cbssports.com/college-basketball/news/2023-ncaa-tournament-the-odds-of-filling-out-a-perfect-bracket-are-1-in-120-2-billion/

Brown, M., & Sokol, J. (2010). An improved LRMC method for NCAA basketball prediction. Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports, 6(3). https://doi.org/10.2202/1559-0410.1202

Bryan, K., Steinke, M., & Wilkins, N. (2006). Upset Special: Are March Madness Upsets Predictable?. Available at SSRN 899702. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.899702

Carlin, B. P. (2005). Improved NCAA basketball tournament modeling via point spread and team strength information. In Anthology of Statistics in Sports (pp. 149-153). Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.1996.10473540

Gupta, A. A. (2015). A new approach to bracket prediction in the NCAA men’s basketball tournament based on a dual-proportion likelihood. Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports, 11(1), 53-67.

Jacobson, S. H. (2009). Seeding in the NCAA men’s basketball tournament: When is a higher seed better?. The Journal of Gambling Business and Economics, 3(2), 63-87.

Harville, D. A. (2003). The selection or seeding of college basketball or football teams for postseason competition. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 98(461), 17-27. 10.2307/30045190

Kaplan, E. H., & Garstka, S. J. (2001). March madness and the office pool. Management Science, 47(3), 369-382.

Kiernan, J.(2023, March 7). 2023 March Madness Stats & Facts. https://wallethub.com/blog/march-madness-statistics/11016

Koenker, R., & Bassett Jr, G. W. (2010). March madness, quantile regression bracketology, and the Hayek hypothesis. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 28(1), 26-35. 10.1198/jbes.2009.07093

Pifer, N. D., DeSchriver, T. D., Baker III, T. A., & Zhang, J. J. (2019). The advantage of experience: Analyzing the effects of player experience on the performances of March Madness teams. Journal of Sports Analytics, 5(2), 137-152. 10.3233/JSA-180331

Schwertman, N. C., Schenk, K. L., & Holbrook, B. C. (1996). More probability models for the NCAA regional basketball tournaments. The American Statistician, 50(1), 34-38. https://doi.org/10.2307/2685724

Shen, G., Gao, D., Wen, Q., & Magel, R. (2016). Predicting results of March Madness using three different methods. Journal of Sports Research, 3(1), 10-17. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.90/2016.3.1/90.1.10.17

Stone, D. F., & Arkes, J. (2018). March Madness? Underreaction to hot and cold hands in NCAA basketball. Economic Inquiry, 56(3), 1724-1747. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecin.12558

Tran, Y. H., Blackburn, J., & Vest, J. R. (2022). Observation of spectators’ mask-wearing behavior at a national basketball tournament. Managing Sport and Leisure, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/23750472.2022.2046492

Wiggins, N. A. Building Better Brackets: An Introductory Analysis of the Impact of Rebounds on NCAA Tournament Progress.

Wilco, D. (2021, March 14). Here’s how your March Madness bracket will do if you only pick the better-seeded team. www.ncaa.com

Williams, M. (2023, March 12). Has anyone ever had a perfect March Madness bracket? Sports Illustrated. https://www.si.com/college/2023/03/12/has-anyone-ever-had-perfect-march-madness-ncaa-tournament-bracket

Yuan, L. H., Liu, A., Yeh, A., Kaufman, A., Reece, A., Bull, P., ... & Bornn, L. (2015). A mixture-of-modelers approach to forecasting NCAA tournament outcomes. Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports, 11(1), 13-27. https://doi.org/10.1515/jqas-2014-0056

Published

2026-03-03