The Role of Feedback Frequency and Valence in Optimizing Motor Task Performance:

Interaction with Physiological Arousal

Authors

  • Mitali Praveen Kumar Saxena Indian Institute of Technology Jodhpur
  • Venkat Ram Reddy Ganuthula Indian Institute of Technology Jodhpur

Keywords:

feedback frequency, valence, motor task, performance, arousal, learning

Abstract

Feedback is an essential stimulus influencing an individual's emotional state and performance. However, there is a lack of agreement among experts regarding the ideal frequency of feedback to achieve optimal results in motor tasks. This study examines how feedback frequency and valence affect individuals' motor skill acquisition, performance, and emotional responses.  We also propose the optimal feedback frequency and valence condition to maximize performance. Further, we hypothesized that arousal level would impact the relationship between feedback and performance in motor tasks. Since adolescence is a critical stage for acquiring motor skills, 120 schoolchildren were tested with different feedback frequencies and valences. The experiment measured task performance in a dart-throwing game and emotional reactions to feedback manipulation. Electrodermal activity measured the emotional responses using physiological arousal as a metric. The findings suggest that both the frequency and positivity of feedback had a substantial impact on the average task performance of the students. The highest level of performance was observed when positive feedback was given frequently. There was no notable disparity in the average arousal levels across the different feedback situations. The study also revealed no effect of feedback frequency on motor skill learning. However, frequent feedback improved learning results over self-evaluation. In addition, the arousal levels moderated the relationship between feedback and task performance. These findings establish a foundation for establishing the most effective feedback frequency to improve the acquisition of motor skills and performance outcomes while also considering the emotional response of the recipients.

References

Abbas, Z., & North, J. (2018). Good-vs. poor-trial feedback in motor learning: The role of self-efficacy and intrinsic motivation across levels of task difficulty. Learning and Instruction, 55, 105–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.09.009

Allen, J. B., & Howe, B. L. (1998). Player Ability, Coach Feedback, and Female Adolescent Athletes’ Perceived Competence and Satisfaction. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 20(3), 280–299. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.20.3.280

Amorose, A. J., & Horn, T. S. (2000). Intrinsic Motivation: Relationships with Collegiate Athletes’ Gender, Scholarship Status, and Perceptions of Their Coaches’ Behavior. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 22(1), 63–84. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.22.1.63

Basalp, E., Wolf, P., & Marchal-Crespo, L. (2021). Haptic Training: Which Types Facilitate (re)Learning of Which Motor Task and for Whom? Answers by a Review. IEEE Transactions on Haptics, 14(4), 722–739. https://doi.org/10.1109/toh.2021.3104518

Belschak, F. D., & Den Hartog, D. N. (2009). Consequences of Positive and Negative Feedback: The Impact on Emotions and Extra‐Role Behaviors. Applied Psychology, 58(2), 274–303. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2008.00336.x

Bennett, B. (C, & Stothart, C. M. (1980). The effects of a relaxation based cognitive technique on sport performances. In P. Klavora & K. A. W. Wipper (Eds.), Psychological and sociological factors and sport. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press, 76-86.

Bosse, H. M., Mohr, J., Buss, B., Krautter, M., Weyrich, P., Herzog, W., Jünger, J., & Nikendei, C. (2015). The benefit of repetitive skills training and frequency of expert feedback in the early acquisition of procedural skills. BMC Medical Education, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-015-0286-5

Burtner, P. A., Leinwand, R., Sullivan, K. J., Goh, H., & Kantak, S. S. (2014). Motor learning in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy: feedback effects on skill acquisition. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 56(3), 259–266. https://doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.12364

Campion, M. A., & Lord, R. G. (1982). A control systems conceptualization of the goal-setting and changing process. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 30(2), 265–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(82)90221-5

Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1981). Attention and Self-Regulation: A Control-Theory Approach to Human Behavior; 1981. New York: Springer.

Chan, K. W., Li, S. Y., Ni, J., & Zhu, J. J. (2021). What Feedback Matters? The Role of Experience in Motivating Crowdsourcing Innovation. Production and Operations Management, 30(1), 103–126. https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.13259

Choi, E., Johnson, D. A., Moon, K., & Oah, S. (2018). Effects of Positive and Negative Feedback Sequence on Work Performance and Emotional Responses. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 38(2–3), 97–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/01608061.2017.1423151

Cianci, A. M., Schaubroeck, J. M., & McGill, G. A. (2010). Achievement Goals, Feedback, and Task Performance. Human Performance, 23(2), 131–154. https://doi.org/10.1080/08959281003621687

Corbett, R., Partington, M., Ryan, L., & Cope, E. (2023). A systematic review of coach augmented verbal feedback during practice and competition in team sports. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching, 19(2), 864–881. https://doi.org/10.1177/17479541231218665

Daniel K. Drost, & John R. Todorovich. (2017). Perceived Competence and Skill Development in Physical Education: The Effect of Teacher Feedback. Journal of Sports Science, 5(6). https://doi.org/10.17265/2332-7839/2017.06.001

Dawson, M. E., Schell, A. M., and Filion, D. L. (2000). “The electrodermal system,” in Handbook of Psychophysiology, 2nd Edn, eds J. T. Cacioppo, L. G. Tassinary, and G. C. Berntson (Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press), 200–223

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). The general causality orientations scale: Self-determination in personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 19(2), 109–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-6566(85)90023-6

D'Mello, S., Lehman, B., & Person, N. (2010). Expert tutors feedback is immediate, direct, and discriminating. In Twenty-Third International FLAIRS Conference.

Dubey, I., Groom, M., Tahir, A., & Hamilton, A. (2023). Social anxiety is more likely to influence reputation management decisions than autistic traits. Autism Research, 17(1), 78–88. https://doi.org/10.1002/aur.3040

Ensergueix, P. J., & Lafont, L. (2010). Reciprocal peer tutoring in a physical education setting: influence of peer tutor training and gender on motor performance and self-efficacy outcomes. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 25(2), 222–242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-009-0010-0

Faller, J., Cummings, J., Saproo, S., & Sajda, P. (2019). Regulation of arousal via online neurofeedback improves human performance in a demanding sensory-motor task. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(13), 6482–6490. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1817207116

Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146

Fishbach, A., Eyal, T., & Finkelstein, S. R. (2010). How Positive and Negative Feedback Motivate Goal Pursuit. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4(8), 517–530. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00285.x

Fujii, S., Lulic, T., & Chen, J. L. (2016). More Feedback Is Better than Less: Learning a Novel Upper Limb Joint Coordination Pattern with Augmented Auditory Feedback. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2016.00251

Harmon, J. M., & Johnson, W. R. (1952). The emotional reactions of college athletes. Research Quarterly, 23(4), 391-397.

Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The Power of Feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487

Hill, J., Berlin, K., Choate, J., Cravens-Brown, L., McKendrick-Calder, L., & Smith, S. (2021). Exploring the Emotional Responses of Undergraduate Students to Assessment Feedback: Implications for Instructors. Teaching & Learning Inquiry, 9(1), 294–316. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.9.1.20

Hill, J., Berlin, K., Choate, J., Cravens-Brown, L., McKendrick-Calder, L., & Smith, S. (2021). Exploring the Emotional Responses of Undergraduate Students to Assessment Feedback: Implications for Instructors. Teaching & Learning Inquiry, 9(1), 294–316. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.9.1.20

Horvers, A., Molenaar, I., Van Der West, H., Bosse, T., & Lazonder, A. W. (2024). Multimodal measurements enhance insights into emotional responses to immediate feedback. Frontiers in Psychology, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1294386

Ilgen, D. R., & Hamstra, B. W. (1972). Performance satisfaction as a function of the difference between expected and reported performance at five levels of reported performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 7(3), 359–370. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(72)90022-0

Ilgen, D. R., Fisher, C. D., & Taylor, M. S. (1979). Consequences of individual feedback on behavior in organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64(4), 349–371. https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.64.4.349

Jarrell, A., Harley, J. M., Lajoie, S., & Naismith, L. (2017). Success, failure and emotions: examining the relationship between performance feedback and emotions in diagnostic reasoning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(5), 1263–1284. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-017-9521-6

Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119(2), 254–284. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.254

Kluger, A. N., Lewinsohn, S., & Aiello, J. R. (1994). The Influence of Feedback on Mood: Linear Effects on Pleasantness and Curvilinear Effects on Arousal. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 60(2), 276–299. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1994.1084

Kok, M., Komen, A., Van Capelleveen, L., & Van Der Kamp, J. (2019). The effects of self-controlled video feedback on motor learning and self-efficacy in a Physical Education setting: an exploratory study on the shot-put. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 25(1), 49–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2019.1688773

Koka, A., & Hein, V. (2003). Perceptions of teacher’s feedback and learning environment as predictors of intrinsic motivation in physical education. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 4(4), 333–346. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1469-0292(02)00012-2

Lazarus, R. S. (1991). Emotion and adaptation. New York: Oxford University Press.

Lipnevich, A. A., Murano, D., Krannich, M., & Goetz, T. (2021). Should I grade or should I comment: Links among feedback, emotions, and performance. Learning and Individual Differences, 89, 102020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2021.102020

Loughead, T. M., & Hardy, J. (2005). An examination of coach and peer leader behaviors in sport. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 6(3), 303–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2004.02.001

Malmberg, J., Haataja, E., Seppänen, T., & Järvelä, S. (2019). Are we together or not? The temporal interplay of monitoring, physiological arousal and physiological synchrony during a collaborative exam. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 14(4), 467–490. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-019-09311-4

Mansfield, A., Aqui, A., Fraser, J. E., Rajachandrakumar, R., Lakhani, B., & Patterson, K. K. (2016). Can augmented feedback facilitate learning a reactive balance task among older adults? Experimental Brain Research, 235(1), 293–304. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-016-4790-6

Marco-Ahulló, A., Villarrasa-Sapiña, I., Romero-Martínez, J., Monfort-Torres, G., Toca-Herrera, J. L., & García-Massó, X. (2024). Effect of Reduced Feedback Frequencies on Motor Learning in a Postural Control Task in Young Adults. Sensors, 24(5), 1404. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24051404

Maslovat, D., Brunke, K. M., Chua, R., & Franks, I. M. (2009). Feedback Effects on Learning a Novel Bimanual Coordination Pattern: Support for the Guidance Hypothesis. Journal of Motor Behavior, 41(1), 45–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222895.2009.10125923

Mason, R. J., Farrow, D., & Hattie, J. A. (2020). An analysis of in-game feedback provided by coaches in an Australian Football League competition. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 25(5), 464–477. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2020.1734555

McKay, B., Hussien, J., Vinh, M. A., Mir-Orefice, A., Brooks, H., & Ste-Marie, D. M. (2022). Meta-analysis of the reduced relative feedback frequency effect on motor learning and performance. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 61, 102165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2022.102165

Mouratidis, A., Vansteenkiste, M., Lens, W., & Sideridis, G. (2008). The Motivating Role of Positive Feedback in Sport and Physical Education: Evidence for a Motivational Model. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 30(2), 240–268. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.30.2.240

Neiss, R. (1988). Reconceptualizing arousal: Psychobiological states in motor performance. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 345–366. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.103.3.345

Newell K.M., Morris L.R., Scully D.M. (1985). Augmented Information and the Acquisition of Skill in Physical Activity. Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews, 13, 235-262. https://doi.org/10.1249/00003677-198500130-00009

O’Loughlin, J., Chróinín, D. N., & O’Grady, D. (2013). Digital video: The impact on children’s learning experiences in primary physical education. European Physical Education Review, 19(2), 165–182. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336x13486050

Oxendine, J. B. (1970). Emotional Arousal and Motor Performance. Quest, 13(1), 23–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.1970.10519673

Palao, J. M., Hastie, P. A., Cruz, P. G., & Ortega, E. (2013). The impact of video technology on student performance in physical education. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 24(1), 51–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939x.2013.813404

Pavett, C. M. (1983). Evaluation of the Impact of Feedback on Performance and Motivation. Human Relations, 36(7), 641–654. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872678303600704

Pitt, E., & Norton, L. (2016). ‘Now that’s the feedback I want!’ Students’ reactions to feedback on graded work and what they do with it. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(4), 499–516. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2016.1142500

Posada-Quintero, H. F., & Chon, K. H. (2020). Innovations in Electrodermal Activity Data Collection and Signal Processing: A Systematic Review. Sensors, 20(2), 479. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20020479

Price, M., Handley, K., Millar, J., & O’Donovan, B. (2010). Feedback : all that effort, but what is the effect? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(3), 277–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930903541007

Radhakrishnan, U., Koumaditis, K., & Chinello, F. (2022). Investigating haptic feedback and arousal for motor skill training in virtual reality. In Haptics: Science, Technology, Applications: 13th International Conference on Human Haptic Sensing and Touch Enabled Computer Applications (EuroHaptics), Proceedings (p. 472).

Radhakrishnan, U., Kuang, L., Koumaditis, K., Chinello, F., & Pacchierotti, C. (2024). Haptic Feedback, Performance and Arousal: A Comparison Study in an Immersive VR Motor Skill Training Task. IEEE Transactions on Haptics, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1109/toh.2023.3319034

Rowe, A. D., Fitness, J., & Wood, L. N. (2013). The role and functionality of emotions in feedback at university: a qualitative study. The Australian Educational Researcher, 41(3), 283–309. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-013-0135-7

Ryan, E. D. (1962). Relationship between Motor Performance and Arousal. Research Quarterly. American Association for Health, Physical Education and Recreation, 33(2), 279–287. https://doi.org/10.1080/10671188.1962.10613203

Salmoni, A. W., Schmidt, R. A., & Walter, C. B. (1984). Knowledge of results and motor learning: A review and critical reappraisal. Psychological Bulletin, 95(3), 355–386. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.95.3.355

Schmidt R.A. (1991). Frequent Augmented Feedback Can Degrade Learning: Evidence and Interpretations. In: Requin J., Stelmach G.E., editors. Tutorials in Motor Neuroscience. Springer; Dordrecht, The Netherlands: 59–75.

Sidaway, B., Bates, J., Occhiogrosso, B., Schlagenhaufer, J., & Wilkes, D. (2012). Interaction of Feedback Frequency and Task Difficulty in Children’s Motor Skill Learning. Physical Therapy, 92(7), 948–957. https://doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20110378

Song, Y., Lu, S., & Smiley-Oyen, A. L. (2019). Differential motor learning via reward and punishment. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 73(2), 249–259. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021819871173

Spampinato, D., & Celnik, P. (2020). Multiple Motor Learning Processes in Humans: Defining Their Neurophysiological Bases. The Neuroscientist, 27(3), 246–267. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073858420939552

Squillante, A. (2018). Olympic Weightlifting for Throwers. Track & Field News. Available online at: https://trackandfieldnews.com/track-coach/olympic-weightlifting-for-throwers/

Sullivan, K. J., Kantak, S. S., & Burtner, P. A. (2008). Motor Learning in Children: Feedback Effects on Skill Acquisition. Physical Therapy, 88(6), 720–732. https://doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20070196

Thorndike, E. L. (1927). The law of effect. The American Journal of Psychology, 39, 212–222. https://doi.org/10.2307/1415413

Tsai, M. J., & Jwo, H. (2015). Controlling Absolute Frequency of Feedback in a Self-Controlled Situation Enhances Motor Learning. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 121(3), 746–758. https://doi.org/10.2466/23.pms.121c28x7

van Vliet, P. M., & Wulf, G. (2006). Extrinsic feedback for motor learning after stroke: What is the evidence? Disability and Rehabilitation, 28(13–14), 831–840. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280500534937

Vancouver, J. B., & Morrison, E. W. (1995). Feedback Inquiry: The Effect of Source Attributes and Individual Differences. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 62(3), 276–285. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1995.1050

Vroom, V. H. (1964). Work and motivation.

Weiner, B. (1985). An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychological review, 92(4), 548.

Weiss, M. R., & Bredemeier, B. J. (1983). Developmental Sport Psychology: A Theoretical Perspective for Studying Children In Sport. Journal of Sport Psychology, 5(2), 216–230. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsp.5.2.216

Whipp, P. R., Jackson, B., Dimmock, J. A., & Soh, J. (2015). The effects of formalized and trained non-reciprocal peer teaching on psychosocial, behavioral, pedagogical, and motor learning outcomes in physical education. Frontiers in Psychology, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00149

Whitney, T., & Ackerman, K. B. (2020). Acknowledging Student Behavior: A Review of Methods Promoting Positive and Constructive Feedback. Beyond Behavior, 29(2), 86–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/1074295620902474

Wine, J. (1971). Test anxiety and direction of attention. Psychological Bulletin, 76(2), 92–104. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0031332

Wulf, G., Schmidt, R. A., & Deubel, H. (1993). Reduced feedback frequency enhances generalized motor program learning but not parameterization learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19(5), 1134–1150. https://doi.org/10.1037//0278-7393.19.5.1134

Wulf, G., Shea, C. H., & Matschiner, S. (1998). Frequent Feedback Enhances Complex Motor Skill Learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 30(2), 180–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222899809601335

Yerkes, R. M., & Dodson, J. D. (1908). The relation of strength of stimulus to rapidity of habit‐formation. Journal of Comparative Neurology and Psychology, 18(5), 459–482. https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.920180503

Zhou, Y., Shao, W. D., & Wang, L. (2021). Effects of Feedback on Students’ Motor Skill Learning in Physical Education: A Systematic Review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(12), 6281. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18126281

Published

2025-11-25